|
RubiStar |
Rubric Made Using:
RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )
>> To save this document onto your
computer, please choose File :: Save As from your Browser
Menu. |
|
|
CATEGORY |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Description |
Makes a complete and detailed description of the
subject matter and/or elements seen in a work. |
Makes a detailed description of most of the subject
matter and/or elements seen in a work. |
Makes a detailed description of some of the subject
matter and/or elements seen in a work. |
Descriptions are not detailed or complete.
|
|
Analysis |
Accurately describes several dominant elements or
principles used by the artist and accurately relates how they are used by
the artist to reinforce the theme, meaning, mood, or feeling of the
artwork. |
Accurately describes a couple of dominant elements and
principles used by the artist and accurately relates how these are used by
the artist to reinforce the theme, meaning, mood, or feeling of the
artwork. |
Describes some dominant elements and principles used
by the artist, but has difficulty describing how these relate to the
meaning or feeling of the artwork. |
Has trouble picking out the dominant elements.
|
|
Interpretation |
Forms a somewhat reasonable hypothesis about the
symbolic or metaphorical meaning and is able to support this with evidence
from the work. |
Student identifies the literal meaning of the work.
|
Student can relate how the work makes him/her feel
personally. |
Student finds it difficult to interpret the meaning of
the work. |
|
Evaluation |
Uses multiple criteria to judge the artwork, such as
composition, expression, creativity, design, communication of ideas.
|
Uses 1-2 criteria to judge the artwork. |
Tries to use aesthetic criteria to judge artwork, but
does not apply the criteria accurately. |
Evaluates work as good or bad based on personal taste.
|
| © 2001, 2002, 2003 High Plains Regional Technology in Education Consortium HPR*TEC |